- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 810 395 5448
- support@essayshredder.com
Temple University Fun Play and Creativity Questions Discussion
1. Please write a few lines about chapter two. Tell me what stood out to you, and any thoughts/personal reflections you have on the content. 5-7 sentences is the expected length.
2. Carve out 30 minutes to watch this Ted Talk by Tim Brown, CEO of “the innovation and design firm” IDEO. He speaks about the parallels between creativity and play. after viewing, ponder. What are you thoughts and reflections? Can you recall a time when you yourself experienced the link between fun/play and creativity or ideation?
https://www.ted.com/talks/tim_brown_on_creativity_…
Write a 1/2-1 page single spaced response answering the questions above.
3. These exercises are a great technique to use to “warm up” your brain. Keeping a book of little challenges like this in your work space is a great idea! A lot of time, we just sit down and get to work. We haven’t really given a brain a chance to turn on and get revving. for creativity, that’s super important! They’re also a great “time out” when you need to shift gears for a moment. Try integrating something like this into your daily work routine. Coloring books are great too! Or a few canisters of Playdoh!
4. Get out a sheet of paper and a pen.
1. Time to brainstorm. Burger King sells breakfast. Did you even know that? Unfortunately, it is the part of the day with their weakest sales, by far. Our job, is to get people to buy Burger King breakfast. What can you come up with? Remember, this is brainstorming – there is no such thing as a bad idea. Write it all down!
2. Once you’ve reached a lull in your ideas, put your pen down. Take a few minutes and do something fun – something that makes you smile and laugh. Play with your dog. Record a Tik Tok video with your roommate. Crank your favorite song and sing along. Watch some funny YouTube videos. The idea here is the FUN. Take a picture or a video of you having your fun to submit. Once you’re having it…
3. Turn on some music that you really like. Pick up a different colored pen/pencil (So we can see where the second set of ideas start). Start writing down whatever else you can think of for Burger King.
4. Say “wow” at how many more ideas you came up with – and maybe even some really good ones!
5. Submit your brainstorming list, your photo/video, and a short paragraph (3-4 sentences) of your thoughts about what happened!
| Order Number |
45471455714 |
|||||
|
Type of Paper |
Essay | |||||
|
Writer Classification Level |
Undergraduate |
|||||
|
Style of Writing |
MLA/APA/CHICAGO/ |
|||||
| Sources and References |
5 |
|||||
|
Number of Pages |
4 |
|||||
| Distinguished
(100%) |
Proficient
(85%) |
Basic
(70%) |
Below Expectations
(50%) |
Non-Performance
(0%) |
||
| Thesis Statement | Raises the strongest objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning. |
Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.
|
Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning. |
Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.
|
The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. | |
| Counter Argument |
Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.
|
Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.
|
Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.
|
Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.
|
The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. | |
| Conclusion |
Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.
|
Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.
|
Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.
|
Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay; however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague. |
The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
|
|
|
Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing
|
Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.
|
Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly. |
Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.
|
Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.
|
The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
|
|
|
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
|
– Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
|
Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand |
Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
|
Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
|
The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
|
|
|
Written Communication: Required Formatting
|
Accurately uses required formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
|
Exhibits required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. |
Exhibits limited knowledge of required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all requirements.
|
Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of required formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as required style.
|
The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
|
|
|
Written Communication: Word Requirement
|
The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words. |
The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of words.
|
The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of words. |
The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of words.
|
The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
|
|
| Written Communication: Resource Requirement | Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
|
Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
|
Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly. | Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
|
The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. | |
https://essaysolving.com/orders/ordernow
